Document details
3
1
H. Lacoste
![](https://conference.sdo.esoc.esa.int/sites/default/files/qrcodes/16472-C-qr.png)
Abstract
We have conducted a series of simulations of several low-Earth orbit (LEO) missions to examine the cost effect of a growing debris population for several different mitigation scenarios. By comparing the best and worst of these, we find that it is cost-effective to raise mission costs by about 1-1.5% now, and still save money by reducing mission costs in the long run. This compares with 3-4% according to an earlier estimate by Greenberg and Reynolds. We have also made a simple calculation of the cost of end of life (EOL) orbit-raising of geostationary (GEO) satellites.
Preview
![](https://conference.sdo.esoc.esa.int/sites/default/files/styles/paper_preview_thumbnail/public/papers_preview/sdc3/21/page-1.png?itok=pl_UMCaq)
![](https://conference.sdo.esoc.esa.int/sites/default/files/styles/paper_preview_thumbnail/public/papers_preview/sdc3/21/page-2.png?itok=-mJWAj5o)
![](https://conference.sdo.esoc.esa.int/sites/default/files/styles/paper_preview_thumbnail/public/papers_preview/sdc3/21/page-3.png?itok=2MDqqbJu)
![](https://conference.sdo.esoc.esa.int/sites/default/files/styles/paper_preview_thumbnail/public/papers_preview/sdc3/21/page-4.png?itok=3BxMDvW7)
![](https://conference.sdo.esoc.esa.int/sites/default/files/styles/paper_preview_thumbnail/public/papers_preview/sdc3/21/page-5.png?itok=nrshJIIr)
![](https://conference.sdo.esoc.esa.int/sites/default/files/styles/paper_preview_thumbnail/public/papers_preview/sdc3/21/page-6.png?itok=c2BWBZ7-)