CopasAPIAutogenProgramme

Welcome Address

Dr. Rolf Densing, Head of ESOC, ESA Director of Operations

Welcome Address

Prof. Jan Wörner, ESA Director General

Introduction

Dr. Holger Krag, Head of ESA Space Debris Office

Space Debris Movie Premiere

Dr. Holger Krag, ESA

Keynote

Dr. Donald Kessler, NASA, retired

SENSITIVITY OF THE SPACE DEBRIS ENVIRONMENT TO LARGE CONSTELLATIONS AND SMALL SATELLITES

Hugh Lewis, University of Southampton

Highlights of Recent Research Activities at the NASA Orbital Debris Program Office

J.- C. Liou, NASA

Current Status of Research and Development on Active Debris Removal at JAXA

Satomi Kawamoto, JAXA

Determining and Modeling Space Debris Attitude States by Fusing Data from different Observation Techniques

Thomas Schildknecht, Astronomical Institute, University of Bern

Use of EISCAT 3D for Observations of space debris

Juha Vierinen, University of Tromsø

Performance analysis of the large space debris tracking telescope in the North Caucasus after the second first light

Artem Mokhnatkin, CAO RAS, KIAM RAS

Stare and chase: Optical pointing determination, orbit calculation and satellite laser ranging within a single pass

Michael Steindorfer, Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences

The Small Size Debris Population at GEO from Optical Observations

Patrick Seitzer, University of Michigan

United Kingdom Infrared Telescope’s Spectrograph Observations of Human-Made Space Objects

Brent Buckalew, NASA Johnson Space Center

Extensive light curve database of Astronomical Institute of the University of Bern

Thomas Schildknecht, Astronomical Institute of the University of Bern (AIUB)

Optimization of Debris Shields on the NISAR Mission’s L-Band Radar Instrument

J Martin Ratliff, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Caltech

SURVEYS OF ISS RETURNED HARDWARE FOR MMOD IMPACTS

James Hyde, Jacobs CLG

Impact Characterization of Stuffed Whipple for China Space Station

Shigui Zheng, China Academy of Space Technology

Investigation on solar array damage characteristic under millimeter size orbital debris hypervelocity impact

Kunbo Xu, Beijing Institute of Spacecraft Environment Engineering

MESO-SCALE COMPUTATIONAL MODELING OF HYPERVELOCITY IMPACT DAMAGE IN ADVANCED MATERIALS

Igor Telichev, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Manitoba

Preliminary concept of a space-based radar for detecting mm-size space debris

Delphine Cerutti-maori, Fraunhofer FHR

Streak Detection and Analysis Pipeline for Space-debris Optical Images

Jenni Virtanen, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute (FGI)

Optical In-Situ Monitor Breadboard System

Jens Utzmann, Airbus DS

High efficiency robotic optical tracking of space debris from PST2 telescope in Arizona

Krzysztof Kaminski, Astronomical Observatory Institute, A.Mickiewicz University

ASSESSMENT OF INFORMATION CONTENT CONTAINED IN OBSERVED PHOTOMETRIC SIGNATURES OF NON-RESOLVED SPACE DEBRIS OBJECTS

Islam Hussein, Applied Defense Solutions

UNDERSTANDING SPACE CRAFT FRAGMENTATION: SIMULATIONS AND EXPERIMENTS

Martin O. Steinhauser, Fraunhofer EMI

Characterization of Orbital Debris via Hyper-velocity Laboratory-based Tests

Heather Cowardin, University of Texas-El Paso\JACOBS-JETS Contract

Methods to Reduce Uncertainties in Spacecraft Vulnerability Predictions

Karl D. Bunte, etamax space GmbH

Predicting the Rupture of a Cryogenic Composite Pressure Vessel (COPV) Following a Hypervelocity Impact

William P. Schonberg, Missouri S&T

STUDY OF HYPERVELOCITY IMPACTS ON SPACE SHIELDS ABOVE 7 KM/S

Hakim Abdulhamid, THIOT INGENIERIE

Debris Attitude Motion Measurements and Modelling by Combining Different Observation Techniques

Jiri Silha, Astronomical Institute of the University of Bern (AIUB)

Temporal analysis of Envisat's rotational motion

Svenja Sommer, Fraunhofer FHR

Automated Attitude Estimation from ISAR Images

Marcos Aviles, GMV

Space debris attitude determination of faint LEO objects using photometry: SwissCube’s cubesat study case

Jean-noel Pittet, AIUB, UniBe

Determination of orbital and spin parameters of LEO satellites by Polish and Ukrainian optical observatories

Krzysztof Kaminski, Astronomical Observatory Institute, A.Mickiewicz University

Determination of Attitude and Attitude Motion of Space Debris, using Laser Ranging and Single-Photon Light Curve Data

Georg Kirchner, Austrian Academy of Sciences

Architecture and first Achievements of a Simulation for the Approach to an uncooperative Target

Susanne Peters, Universität der Bundeswehr München

Cost analysis of active debris removal scenarios and system architectures

Toru Yamamoto, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency

The RemoveDebris ADR Mission: Preparing for an International Space Station Launch

Jason Forshaw, Surrey Space Centre

Choice of a suitable target for developing proposals for an ADR flight demonstration experiment

Valeriy Trushlyakov, Omsk State Technical University

A mission to Demonstrate the Preservation of the Geostationary Orbit

Roger Longstaff, Guest Associates (Europe) Ltd.

Proposed Series of Orbital Debris Remediation Activities

Darren Mcknight, IAI

Expanding Knowledge on Real Situation at High Near-Earth Orbits

Vladimir Agapov, Roskosmos

Development of the Space Debris Sensor (SDS)

Joseph Hamilton, NASA Johnson Space Center

Using antennae for in-situ measurements of micrometeoroid and space debris impacts

Martin Schimmerohn, Fraunhofer EMI

Environmental Estimation on Sub-millimeter-size Debris using In-situ Measurement Data

Masahiro Furumoto, Kyushu University

STEP BY STEP REALIZATION OF AN OPERATIONAL ON ORBIT DETECTION NETWORK

Waldemar Bauer, German Aerospace Center (DLR)

e.Deorbit – ESA’s Active Debris Removal Mission

Robin Biesbroek, ESA

Definition of an Automated Vehicle with Autonomous Fail-Safe Reaction Behavior to Capture and Deorbit Envisat.

Stéphane Estable, Airbus DS

Active Debris Removal and Space Debris Mitigation using Hybrid Propulsion Solutions

Christina Parigini, Deimos

Modeling and Perspectives of Low-Work-Function Electrodynamic Tethers to Deorbit Space Debris

Gonzalo Sanchez-arriaga, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid

IDEA OSG 1: Prelaunch Status Report

Kohei Fujimoto, Astroscale

TAROT: A network for Space Surveillance and Tracking operations

Michel Boër, CNRS-ARTEMIS

SMARTnet – First Results of the Telescope Network

Hauke Fiedler, DLR

GESTRA_Technology Aspects and Mode Design for Space Surveillance and Tracking

Helmut Wilden, Fraunhofer FHR

Sensor Tasking for multi-sensor Space Object Surveillance

Carolin Frueh, Purdue University

Architectural description of the Spanish Space Surveillance and Tracking System

Maria Antonia Ramos Prada , CDTI

Space Surveillance and Tracking in ESA's SSA programme

Tim Flohrer, ESA

Orbital and Solar Storm Analysis of the Pulsed Electrostatic Tractor

Joseph Hughes, CU Boulder

MEDUSA – Mechanism for Entrapment of Debris Using Shape memory Alloy

Wei-yu L. Feng, SpaceLab - University of Cape Town

Experimental setup and tests’ results for uncooperative objects capture and manoeuvring with robotic arm

Michèle Lavagna, Politecnico di Milano

Net Capture System for Debris Removal Demonstration Mission

Ingo Retat, Airbus DS GmbH

Design and Testing of a Full Scale Harpoon Capture System

Alastair Wayman, Airbus Defence and Space

Validation methods of the grippers capabilities to capture Launch Adapting Rings of the non-cooperative satellites

Jaroslaw Jaworski, PIAP

GRAVES Space Surveillance System: Life Extension and Upgrade Program

Florent Muller, ONERA

Development of Laser Measurement to Space Debris at Shanghai SLR Station

Zhongping Zhang, Shanghai Astrronomical Observatory of CAS

First Results from an ESA Study on Accurate Orbit Determination with Laser Tracking of uncooperative Targets

Stefan Riepl, Federal Office for Cartography and Geodesy Wettzell Germany

Innovative Technologies for Optical Ground Stations

Leif Humbert, German Aerospace Center

Performance Assessment of the Multibeam Radar Sensor BIRALES for Space Surveillance and Tracking

Matteo Losacco, Politecnico di Milano

TETHERED-TUGS FOR ACTIVE DEBRIS REMOVAL: MICROGRAVITY EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION OF DYNAMICS AND CONTROL

Michelle Lavagna, politecnico di Milano

TETHERS AS PULLING CAPTURE TECHNOLOGY FOR E.DEORBIT AND NET/HARPOON-BASED ADR MISSIONS

Andrea Messidoro, Aero Sekur S.p.A.

Airbus DS Vision Based Navigation solutions tested on LIRIS experiment data

Keyvan Kanani, ADS Toulouse

An experiment of measuring position and attitude of space debris by stereo-vision in orbital optical condition

Shoya Tomori, Waseda University

Evaluation of Feature Detectors for Infrared Imaging in view of Active Debris Removal

Ozgun Yilmaz, Cranfield University

Deformation of space debris and subsequent changes in orbit during eclipse due to solar and Earth radiation fluxes.

Stuart Grey, University of Strathclyde

Fusion of laser ranges and angular measurements data for LEO and GEO space debris orbit determination

Emiliano Cordelli, Astronomical Institute of the University of Bern

A Novel Initial Orbit Determination Algorithm from Doppler and Angular Observations

Juan Carlos Dolado Perez, CNES

Automatic Domain Pruning Filter for Optical Observations on Short Arcs

Gennaro Principe, University of Southampton

Using Conjunction Analysis Methods for Manoeuvre Detection

Johannes Herzog, Deutsches Zentrum fuer Luft- und Raumfahrt

Assessment of post-maneuver observation correlation using short-arc tracklets

Jan Siminski, ESA/ESOC

Simulation of the Ariane 5 EPC reentry with the Fragmentation tool suite

Célia Finzi, Airbus Safran Launchers

Progress in Hybrid Spacecraft/Object Oriented Destructive Re-entry Modelling using the SAM Code

James Beck, Belstead Research

Upgrade of DRAMA's Spacecraft Entry Survival Analysis Codes

Ronny Kanzler, Hyperschall Technologie Göttingen GmbH

DEBRIS: an Object Oriented Code for Footprint, Survivability and Risk Assessment

Cristina Parigini, Deimos Space

Uncertainty Quantification in Orbital Debris Reentry for Reliable Ground Footprint Estimation

Francois J. Sanson, INRIA

The definition of the Multistep Inputs Statistics method for the computation of the safety re-entry area

Simone Flavio Rafano Carnà, Politecnico di Milano

Cataloguing Space objects from observations: CORTO cataloguing system

Raúl Domínguez-gonzález, Elecnor Deimos

Optical measurements association using Optimized Boundary Value IOD coupled with Markov Clustering algorithm

Carlos Yanez, CNES

Tracklet-tracklet correlation method for radar and angle observations

Alessandro Vananti, Astronomical Institute, University of Bern

Methods of Predicting and Processing Breakups of Space Objects

Zachary Slatton, 18 SPCS, USAF

ESA’s SST DATA CENTRE INTEGRATION

Diego Escobar, GMV Aerospace and Defence

Assessing the risk and the uncertainty affecting the uncontrolled reentry of manmade space objects

Carmen Pardini, ISTI/CNR

Uncertainty Characterization of Atmospheric Density Models for Orbit Prediction of Space Debris

Luc Sagnieres, McGill University

Re-entry Prediction Uncertainties derived from Environmental and Observation considerations

Noelia Sánchez-ortiz, Elecnor DEIMOS

Thermosphere model evaluation at low altitude with GOCE densities

Sean Bruinsma, CNES

Practicalities of re-entry predictions – the VEGA-01 AVUM case

Benjamin Bastida Virgili, IMS Space Consultancy at Space Debris Office

Information Theoretic Approaches to Space Object Collision

Kyle Demars, Missouri University of Science and Technology

Covariance Size and the Breakdown of Gaussianity in GEO Uncertainty Predictions

Marek Möckel, Space Environment Research Centre Ltd.

Space Debris Braking System using derivative SRM for Just-In Time Collision Avoidance Maneuver

Cedric Dupont, BERTIN TECHNOLOGIES

Satellite collision probability for long-term encounters and arbitrary primary satellite shape.

Georges Krier, SES Engineering

Current Collision Avoidance service by ESA's Space Debris Office

Klaus Merz, ESA

GMV/ISON COMBINED OPTICAL CAMPAIGNS

Diego Escobar, GMV Aerospace and Defence

Numerical Flow Analysis of the ISS Re-Entry

Fabian Zander, Institute of Space Systems

Minimum dV for Targeted Spacecraft Disposal

John B. Bacon, NASA

Evaluation of re-entry conditions from orbits at the Lagrangian points

Francesca Letizia, University of Southampton

On the re-entry design for the SOHO mission

Elisa Maria Alessi, IFAC-CNR

Planned yet uncontrolled re-entries of the Cluster-II spacecraft

Stijn Lemmens, ESA

ESA CLEANSAT _ SMA dismantlement mechanisms

Stephane Heinrich, ALTRAN

A quantitative evaluation of the environmental impact of the mega constellations

Alessandro Rossi, IFAC-CNR

MAXIMIZING POST MISSION DISPOSAL OF MEGA CONSTELLATIONS SATELLITES REACHING END OF OPERATIONAL LIFETIME

Miki Ito, Astroscale Japan Inc.

LUCA2 - An enhanced long-term utility for collision analysis

Jonas Radtke, TU Braunschweig, Institute of Space Systems

Self-induced collision risk analysis for large constellations

Hugh Lewis, University of Southampton

Optimization of constellation jettisoning regards to short term collision risks

Handschuh David-alexis, CNES-DLA

Analysis of orbit stability in the geosynchronous region for end-of-life disposal

Camilla Colombo, Politecnico di Milano

MEO dynamics and GNSS disposal strategies

Alessandro Rossi, IFAC-CNR, Italy

Status of the Space Environment: Current Level of Adherence to the Space Debris Mitigation Policy

Stefan Frey, ESA

SEMI-CONTROLLED REENTRY

Claire Fremeaux, CNES

Tundra Disposal Orbit Study

Marlon E. Sorge, The Aerospace Corporation

EFFECTS OF CUBESAT DEPLOYMENTS IN LOW-EARTH ORBIT

Andrew B. Vavrin, Orbital Debris Program Office

Risk induced by the uncatalogued space debris population in the presence of large constellations

Bruno Revelin, CS

Assessing uncertainties in the estimation of the orbital lifetime

Andrea Operti, Politecnico di Torino

Analysis of Breakup Events

Vitali Braun, European Space Agency

Forensic Analysis of On-Orbit Debris Generation Events

Marlon Sorge, The Aerospace Corporation

DISCOS 3: An improved data model for ESA's Database and Information System Characterising Objects in Space

Frazer Mclean, CS GmbH

Impacts of the Space Debris Mitigation rules on the spacecraft design in Airbus Defence and Space

Daniel Briot, Airbus Defence and Space

Industry Processes for Space Debris Mitigation in Early Mission Definition: Current State and Room for Improvement

Charlotte Bewick, OHB System AG

Space Debris Management of Launch Operations

Alexis Macaire, Arianespace

IMPACT OF SPACE DEBRIS MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS ON THE MISSION DESIGN OF ESA SPACECRAFT

Rüdiger Jehn, ESA/ESOC

MAJOR TRENDS FOR MITIGATION OF SPACE DEBRIS IN NEAR-EARTH SPACE IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

Igor Usovik, TSNIImash

Life Cycle Assessment Indicator for Space Debris

Camilla Colombo, Politecnico di Milano

Extending the ECOB space debris index with fragmentation risk estimation

Francesca Letizia, University of Southampton

IMPROVEMENT OF SPACE DEBRIS MODEL IN MEO AND GEO REGIONS ACCORDING TO THE CATALOG OF KIAM RAS

Igor Usovik, TSNIImash

A comparison of damaging meteoroid and orbital debris fluxes in Earth orbit

William Cooke, NASA/MSFC

Algorithms for the Computation of Debris Risks

Mark J. Matney, NASA Orbital Debris Program Office

A COMPARISON OF THE SOCIT AND DEBRISAT EXPERIMENTS

Erick Ausay, University of Florida

Statement

Rolf Densing, ESA, Director of Operations

Statement

Brigitte Zypries, Minister of Economy, Federal Republic of Germany

Statement

Holger Krag, ESA

Statement

Thomas Schildknecht, COSPAR

Statement

Christophe Bonnal, IAA

Statement

Cosimo Marzo, ASI

Statement

Christian Cazaux, CNES

Statement

Manuel Metz, DLR

Statement

Hugh Lewis, UKSA

Questions and Answers to the Panel

Moderation: B. Von Weyhe, ESOC Public Relations

Design for Demise techniques for medium/large LEO satellites reentry

Lilith Grassi, thales alenia space

Results of the Deployable Membrane & ADEO Passive De-Orbit Subsystem Activities leading to a Dragsail Demonstrator

Thomas Sinn, HPS GmbH

Development of Commercial Drag-Augmentation Systems for Small Satellites

Chiara Palla, Cranfield University

ESTCube-2 plasma brake payload for effective deorbiting

Iaroslav Iakubivskyi, Tartu Observatory

FRAGMENTATION EVENT DEBRIS FIELD EVOLUTION USING 3D VOLUMETRIC RISK ASSESSMENT

David Vallado, agi

Estimation of Rotating RSO Parameters using Radar Data and Joint Time-Frequency Transforms

Selenia Ghio, University of Pisa

Photometrical Database of GSS and methods of identification satellites on their photometrical characteristics

Vladimir Kouprianov , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Light-curves of Retired Geosynchronous Satellites

Conor Benson, University of Colorado Boulder

An efficient and automatic debris detection framework based on GPU technology

Tommaso Cardona, La Sapienza

Faint Streak Detection with Certificate by Adaptive Two-Level Bayesian Inference

Radim Sara, Center for Machine Perception, Czech Technical University

The ESA Space Collaborative Observation Platform (SCOOP), objectives and functionalities

Noelia Sánchez-ortiz, Elecnor DEIMOS

Preparing the new 2 kHz satellite laser ranging system in Finland for debris observations

Jenni Virtanen, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute

SPIN-UP OF SPACE DEBRIS CAUSED BY SOLAR RADIATION PRESSURE

Daniel Kucharski, Space Environment Research Centre, Australia

Light Curve Properties of high earth orbital rocket bodies Observed at Weihai Observatory of Shandong University

Shao Ming Hu, Shandong University

LEDSat: Design of a CubeSat equipped with LEDs as calibration target

Patrick Seitzer, University of Michigan

Multi-band photometric observations of GEO satellites: Preliminary Results

Alessandra Di Cecco, National Institute for Astrophysics, Observatory of Teramo

On-Sky Evaluation of Passive Polarimetry as a Technique to Characterise Space Debris

Manuel Cegarra Polo, University of New South Wales

Probability of Detection and Likelihood: Application to Space Object Observation

Francois J. Sanson, INRIA

Automatic pipeline for light-curves variability analysis of GEO objects

Tommaso Cardona, Sapienza University of Rome

Adaptive Optics for Satellite Imaging and Earth Based Space Debris Manoeuvres

Doris Grosse, Australian National University, Serc Limited

Precise orbit propagation of space debris objects using the Hermite integration scheme

Jens Rodmann, DLR

Observing Strategies for Focused Orbital Debris Surveys Using the Magellan Telescope

James Frith, University of Texas El Paso

GROUND-BASED OBSERVING CAMPAIGNS OF BRIZ-M DEBRIS WITH THE UKIRT AND NASA MCAT TELESCOPES

Susan M. Lederer, NASA Johnson Space Center

A remote photometry telescope for space debris in Tibet

Ge Liang, NAOC

FORTE: ISON Robotic Telescope Control Software

Vladimir Kouprianov, Pulkovo Observatory of Russian Academy of Sciences

The Fly-Eye Telescope Customization for Debris Discovery and Cataloguing

Lorenzo Cibin, Compagnia Generale per lo Spazio

Orbital Solutions to LEO-to-LEO Angles-only Very Short-arc Tracks

Jizhang Sang, Wuhan University

Ontology for the Space Situational Awareness Programme in Europe

Robert J. Rovetto, n/a

The current state of the KIAM database on space debris in high orbit and its use for prediction of dangerous approaches

Viktor A. Voropaev, Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics

Accurate Orbit Determination of Space Debris with Laser Tracking

Christoph Bamann, Technical University of Munich

Determining Debris Characteristics from Observability Analysis of Artificial Near-Earth Objects

Carolin Frueh, Purdue University

Evaluation of Data Stream Management Systems in the Context of Space Surveillance and Tracking

Sven Müller, Institute of Space Systems, TU Braunschweig

Covariance Matrix Uncertainty Analysis and Correction

Juan Carlos Dolado Perez, CNES

Attitude Characterization of Aerodynamic Stable Objects Based on TLE

Cristina Parigini, Deimos Space

Accurate Optical Observations of Space Objects in GEO, and applicability to closer LEO regimes

Jaime Nomen Torres, Elecnor DEIMOS

GENERIC DATA REDUCTION FRAMEWORK FOR SPACE SURVEILLANCE

Bogdan Bija, GMV

Assessment and Modelling of Space Surveillance Network

Jacco Geul, Delft University of Technology

Initial Orbit Determination based on the High-order Propagation of Orbit Sets

Laura Pirovano, Universidad de La Rioja

A new tool to observe low and higher Earth orbits: the MetaTelescope

Michel Boer, CNRS-ARTEMIS

Explained and Unexplained Momentum Impulse Transfer Events (MITEs)

Brian Flewelling, Exoanalytic

Orbit determination result with the angle-only measurement from the optical tracking network, OWL-Net

Jin Choi, KASI, UST

Conceptual Design for Expert Coordination Centres Supporting Optical and Laser Observations in a SST System

Jiri Silha, Astronomical Institute of the University of Bern (AIUB)

Geometric restructurization of the space object tracking problem for improved uncertainty representation

John T. Kent, University of Leeds

SST Analysis tool (SSTAN) supporting Space Surveillance and Tracking (SST) services assessment

Roxana L. Andrisan, Deimos Space SRL

Worldwide optical network for Space Situational Awareness

Marine Pyanet, Airbus Safran Launchers

OWL-Net : A Global network of robotic telescopes dedicated to SSA observation

Jang-hyun Park, Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute

Requirements for Observation Scenarios to Maintain a Catalogue of Space Debris Objects in Geosynchronous Region

Andreas Hinze, DLR

CryoSat-2 : In-Orbit Collision Avoidance Manoeuvre Support Tools and Operation Evolutions

David Fornarelli, RHEA Group

Current Status of Web Services at ESA’s Space Debris Office

Quirin Funke, European Space Agency

Analysis of CDM Covariance Consistency in Operational Collision Avoidance

Benedikt Reihs, ESA

Collision Avoidance assessment and mitigation measures for controlled GEO/GSO spacecrafts with Orbital Debris

Rajesh Kannan M R, Master Control Facility, ISRO, India

Determining Orbits for Collision Prediction using Dynamical Systems Theory

Aswath Suryanarayanan, The PSBB Millennium School, Chennai, India

POSTPROCESSED-TLE CATALOGUE FOR CONJUNCTION DETECTION WITH GEO PASSIVE OBJECTS

Diego Escobar, GMV Aerospace and Defence

Collision Risk Computation accounting for Complex geometries of involved objects

Noelia Sánchez-ortiz, Elecnor DEIMOS

Close Encounters of an Advanced Kind: Lessons Learned and New Approaches in Collision Risk Assessment and Mitigation

Viqar Abbasi, Canadian Space Agency

Status of the ISO Space Debris Mitigation Standards (2017)

Hedley Stokes, PHS Space Ltd.

Accurate Flight Dynamics for ESA' Space Debris Movie: The OREKIT solution

Bruno Revelin, C-S

Long-term implications of GNSS disposal strategies for the space debris environment

Raúl Domínguez-gonzález, Elecnor Deimos

Design for Demise: Systems-level techniques to reduce re-entry casualty risk

David Riley, Deimos Space UK Ltd.

TeSeR – Technology for Self-Removal – First results of an H2020 Project to develop a Post-Mission-Disposal Module

Philipp Voigt, Airbus DS GmbH

Efficient De-Orbiting of Micro- and Nano Satellites using the IFM Nano Thruster

Richard Sypniewski, Fotec

FRAGMENTATION EVENTS ANALYSIS MAKING USE OF FRAGMENTATION EVENT MODEL AND ASSESSMENT TOOL (FREMAT)

Roxana L. Andrisan, Deimos Space SRL

CARTOGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE MEO PHASE SPACE FOR PASSIVE DEBRIS REMOVAL

Despoina K. Skoulidou, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

Average Cross-Sectional Area of Idealized DebriSat Fragments Using Icosahedron Motivated Orientation Vectors

Thomas Scruggs, University of Florida

A Comparison of Results from NASA's Meteoroid Engineering Model to the LDEF Cratering Record

Steven Ehlert, Qualis, NASA Meteoroid Environment Office

EFFECT OF PHASE ANGLE ON LIGHT CURVE DATA FOR FEATURE ESTIMATION OF HIGH AREA-TO-MASS RATIO SPACE OBJECTS

Vishnuu Mallik, University of Arizona

GEO space debris environment determination in the earth fixed coordinate system

Pang Baojun, Harbin Institute of Technology

A new Space Debris Environment Engineering Model SDEEM 2015

Pang Baojun, Harbin Institute of Technology

An Index for Ranking Active Debris Removal Targets in LEO

Carmen Pardini, ISTI/CNR

Recent Extensions of the ESABASE2/Debris Impact Risk Assessment Tool

Anatoli Miller, etamax space GmbH

Examination of Debris Cloud Density Resulting From Precession of Argument of Perigee Due to J2 Effect

Joel Slotten, Navistel, LLC

The contribution of NaK droplets to the space debris environment

Carsten Wiedemann, Institute of Space Systems, TU Braunschweig

The study of the dynamics of mega-constellations of near-Earth space objects

Ivan N. Chuvashov, Tomsk State University

Improvements on models and analysis means for fragmentation events

Alexis Petit, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium

Investigation of propagation accuracy effects within the modeling of space debris

Andre Horstmann, Institute of Space Systems

Results of Reference Long-term Simulations Focussing on Passive Means to Reduce the Impact of Space Debris

Volker Schaus, TU Braunschweig, Institute of Space Systems

Meteor shower forecasting for spacecraft operations

Althea V. Moorhead, NASA Meteoroid Environment Office

The impact of the increase in small satellite launch traffic on the long-term evolution of the space debris environment

Jonas Radtke, TU Braunschweig, Institute of Space Systems

A COLLISION IN A CUBESAT CONSTELLATION

Fatoumata Kebe, IMCCE- Paris Observatory

Spatial density maps from a fragmentation

Liam M. Healy, Naval Research Laboratory

A statistical LEO model to investigate adaptable debris control strategies

Gian Luigi Somma, University of Southampton

Space debris atmospheric entry prediction with spacecraft-oriented tools

Julien Annaloro, CNES

INFLUENCE OF OXIDATION AND EMISSIVITY FOR METALLIC ALLOYS SPACE DEBRIS DURING THEIR ATMOSPHERIC ENTRY

Lucile Barka, PROMES-CNRS lab

Integrated Analysis System for Re-entry Risk Assessment

Eun Jung Choi Choi, Korea Astronomy and Space Science

High-fidelity Numerical Simulations for Destructive Re-entry of Upper Stages

Keiichiro Fujimoto, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency

Leveraging Lessons from the Climate Change Community and the Financial Sector to Improve Space Debris Regulations

Norman Fitz-coy, University of Florida

AERO-THERMAL RE-ENTRY SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS USING DSMC AND A HIGH DIMENSIONAL MODEL REPRESENTATION-BASED APPROACH

Alessandro Falchi, University of Strathclyde

Calculating the Re-Entry Probability for a given Area of Interest

Jens Agena, DLR

Containment tether – concept study of an efficient solution to reduce the casualty area of spacecraft components

Jan-christian Meyer, OHB System

GOCE radar-based Orbit Determination for Re-Entry Predictions and comparison with GPS-based POD

Stefano Cicalò, SpaceDynamics Services S.r.l.

On the demisability and survivability of modern spacecraft

Mirko Trisolini, University of Southampton

AIRBORNE OBSERVATIONS OF RE-ENTERING SPACE DEBRIS - RESULTS AND PROSPECTS

Fabian Zander, IRS

THE APPROACH TO CASUALTY RE-ENTRY RISK MITIGATION IN COSMO-SkyMed CURRENT AND FUTURE GENERATIONS

Silvia Occhigrossi, Thales Alenia Space

Two-Line Element Uncertainty for GOCE Statistical Re-entry Predictions

Jacco Geul, Delft University of Technology

ADRYANS® V5.0 – A 1-dimension object oriented survivability tool

Charles Bertorello, Airbus Safran Launchers

Predicted lifetime of HEO space debris calculated using various atmospheric models

Dorota Kruzynska, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

How to integrate Space Debris issue into the Life Cycle Assessment of Space Missions?

Thibaut Maury, Airbus Safran Launchers / University of Bordeaux

Modelling and analysis of the folding principle used in Self-deployable Deorbiting Space Structures

Jan A. Nikolajsen, Aalborg University

Analysis of pretension and stress stiffening in Self-deployable Deorbiting Space Structures

Peter R. Lauridsen, Aalborg University

CleanSat - Coordinated approach reshaping technology development for space

Tiago Soares, ESA

THE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT AND DEBRIS PRODUCTION RISK MITIGATION IN COSMO-SkyMed CURRENT AND FUTURE GENERATIONS

Silvia Occhigrossi, Thales Alenia Space Italy

The H2020 project ReDSHIFT: overview, first results and perspectives

Alessandro Rossi, IIFAC-CNR, Italy

Debris Mitigation by Collision Avoidance after End-of-Mission – assessment of a disposal solution for LEO satellites

Jan-christian Meyer, OHB System

LEO mapping for passive dynamical disposal

Giulia Schettino, IFAC-CNR

Low Power Arcjet Application for End of Life Satellite Servicing

Michael Dropmann, Institute of Space Systems

Approaches and models for flexible tether connections in active debris removal missions

Marcel Becker, TU Braunschweig

Analysis of Tumbling Space Debris Capturing Using A Tethered-Net

Minghe Shan, Delft University of Technology

SPACE DEBRIS MITIGATION AND REMEDIATION: PERSPECTIVES OF AFFORDABLE HYBRID PROPULSION IMPLEMENTATIONS

Christian Paravan, Politecnico di Milano

Design of net ejector for space debris capturing

Umberto Battista, Stam S.r.l.

Motion and Parameter Estimation of an Uncooperative Space Object Using Range Image Data

Mahboubeh Zarei-jalalabadi, Sharif University of Technology

Innovative Net & Space Inflatable structure for active Debris Removal (INSIDeR)

Cedric Dupont, BERTIN TECHNOLOGIES

Touchless Electrostatic Detumble of a Representative Box-and-Panel Spacecraft Configuration

Trevor Bennett, University of Colorado Boulder

Characteristics of ablation impulse induced by repetitive laser pulse irradiations

Akihiro Sasoh, Nagoya University

Radio frequency source of weakly expanding wedge-shaped xenon ion beam for contactless removal of large-sized SD objects

V. Obukhov, RIAME MAI

Application of space tethered systems for space debris removal

Pavel A. Diakov, Lomonosov Moscow State University

Untrackable Space Debris Active Removal Using a Nano Satellite

Woosang Park, KAIST

Optimization of maneuvering schemes in the framework of ADR mission in LEO

Dmitriy Grishko, Bauman Moscow State Technical University

Probability of Intersection for Laser-Based Debris Removal in the Presence of Uncertainty

Islam Hussein, Applied Defense Solutions

Parameters design of autonomous docking module and the choice of suitable target and primary payload for ADR

Valeriy Trushlyakov, Omsk state technical university

Initial Study on Small Debris Impact Risk Assessment during Orbit Transfer to GEO for All-Electric Satellite

Masumi Higashide, JAXA, Fraunhofer EMI

A PARADIGM FOR THE DESIGN OF ORBITAL DEBRIS PROTECTION FOR SPACECRAFT COMPOSITE PRESSURE VESSELS

Igor Telichev, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Manitoba

Protection of Manned Spacecraft Radiator from Space Debris

Li Shan, Institute of Spacecraft System Engineering, CAST

Shielding properties investigation of impact-initiated energetic materials under hypervelocity impact

Qiang Wu, Beijing Institute of Spacecraft Environment Engineering

Evaluation of the hypervelocity impact resistance of FMLs by numerical simulation

Chunsen Shi, Delft University of Technology

Effects of Gamma Ray Irradiation on Ejecta Size from CFRP Plates

Masahiro Nishida, Nagoya Institute of Technology

Fracture of Unidirectional Tensioned Polyimide Films under Simulated Space Debris Hypervelocity Impact

Kunbo Xu, Beijing Institute of Spacecraft Environment Engineering

Evolution of Spacecraft Orbital Motion due to Hypervelocity Impacts from Debris and Meteoroids

Luc Sagnieres, McGill University

DebriSat's DCS: A Database-Based Solution to the Big Data Challenges Impacting the Future Regulation of Orbital Debris

Joe Kleespies, University of Florida